|
Bisbee's Buzz
Hurricanes 2006 – Predictions and Preparations
The official Atlantic hurricane season started June 1, 2006
The
2006 Hurricane Season forecast this year is highlighting the region from the Carolinas northeast as the prime area for above-normal
risk of impact from hurricane activity. While the Carolina
coast has seen direct hurricane landfalls several times since the start of the
current multi-decadal cycle in 1995 (Bertha and Fran in 1996, Bonnie in 1998,
Floyd in 1999 and Isabel in 2003), Long Island and southeastern New England have escaped a hurricane strike. Other areas
at elevated risk are the Gulf Coast from central Louisiana
westward, especially early in the season, with an eye toward the southwest Florida Gulf coast later in the season. The only
good news is that this pattern suggests a significantly reduced risk, relative
to normal, for the eastern and central Gulf Coast
- an area hit by four named storms last season, two of which were major
hurricanes. The initial landfall forecast is for three major (Category 3 or
greater) hurricane hits this year on the United States coast, two hurricanes
of Category 2 or less and one tropical storm - a total of six storms making
landfall.
The National
Hurricane Center
says the 2006 Atlantic hurricane season will be more active than average, but
won’t see last year’s record numbers.
Meteorologists said water in the Atlantic
is not as warm as it was at this time in 2005, meaning potential storms would
have less of the fuel needed to develop into hurricanes. Scientists said it is unclear if atmospheric
conditions that helped produce the 2005 storms will happen again this year, but
the Pacific Ocean water conditions known as El
Nino and La Nina will not affect the season.
NAMED STORMS
| |
2002
|
2003
|
2004
|
2005
|
2006
|
Prediction
|
9 – 13
|
11 – 15
|
12 – 15
|
12 – 15
|
13 – 16
|
Actual
|
12
|
16
|
15
|
28
|
?
|
HARM’S WAY
34.6 Million:
Estimated 7-1-05, population of the area most threatened by Atlantic hurricanes – the coastal areas of the states stretching from North Carolina to Texas. At that time, 12% of the nation’s population resided in those areas.
13.7 Million:
Estimated 2005 coastal population of Florida. Another 4 million Floridians live inland, but would not necessarily be out of danger. The coastal population of Florida is about half the coastal population of the states stretching from North Carolina to Texas.
487 Percent:
Percentage growth of Florida’s coastal population between 1950 and 2000. Among the states along the coast between North Carolina and Texas, Florida had the highest rate of growth in its coastal population over that period.
2006 Storm Names
Alberto, Beryl, Chris, Debbie, Ernesto, Florence, Gordon, Helene, Isaac, Joyce, Leslie, Michael, Nadine, Oscar, Rafael, Sandy, Tony, Valerie, and William.
Increase in Major Hurricanes Linked to Warmer Seas
"We're not saying that global warming is causing there to be more intense hurricanes,” said study author Peter Webster of Georgia Tech. "What we're saying is that sea surface temperatures are rising, and the intensity of hurricanes is associated with that. The warmer the sea surface temperature, the more intense the hurricanes."
As a hurricane builds up energy, it feeds off heat from the water. As water heats up, it turns into water vapor. As water vapor rises, it cools, condenses into rain, and releases heat that fuels the hurricane. The higher the vapor rises, the more heat is released, and the more intense the storm.
From their data, Webster and his colleagues determined that global sea surface temperatures have increased by half a degree Celsius since 1970. As a result, waters worldwide are primed for making hurricanes.
"Hurricane fuel, so to speak, is water vapor that rises from the surface. Small increases in sea surface temperature give you rapidly more vapor, making hurricanes more intense," Webster said.
While most scientists agree that global sea surface temperatures have increased, they don't all agree on what drives this change. One school of thought is that long-term variability of ocean temperatures drives the change, and that right now the oceans are in a warm phase unrelated to climate change.
"The other is global warming," Webster said. "We thought the way to test both hypotheses was to look at global sea surface temperature statistics."
If natural variability is the cause of rising sea surface temperatures, different sea surface temperature patterns would occur in the different ocean basins because of variations in the atmosphere above them. However, Webster and his colleagues found fairly uniform temperature changes around the globe, leading them to believe this change is due to global warming.
"We found that the sea surface temperature has risen 0.5 degrees Celsius in all basins since 1970," Webster said. "If it is due to natural variation, it must be something that's a global trend, but we don't know what that could be yet."
While warm water temperatures fuel hurricanes, a storm then cools down the sea surface. It is nature's way of moving energy from the tropics northward and dumping it, as rain, in places like the United States.
"The only way you can supply energy is by cooling the surface. You take low energy water and make high-energy water vapor. In doing so, you cool the ocean surface," Webster said. "Hurricanes are very effective at taking energy out of the ocean."
As the hurricane builds up, it pulls more and more water vapor away from the sea surface, releasing more heat as it does so. In addition to cooling the water this way, the intense hurricane winds also mix cool water from the deep with warmer surface water.
Fewer total hurricanes
So if warmer sea surface temperatures lead to an increase in intense hurricanes, why has there been a decrease in the total number of hurricanes in this same period?
"We don't have a simple theory to explain that one, as we do with hurricane intensity, but there may be a relationship," Judith Curry, also of Georgia Tech and a study co-author said yesterday in a teleconference, adding that the intense hurricanes may hinder the formation of other hurricanes by removing so much heat from the ocean.
Scientists have long known that when one tropical storm follows the same path as a previous hurricane, it is less likely to grow strong.
Another observation of the study was that the global number of hurricane days has steadily been decreasing. In 1995 there were 870 hurricane and tropical storm days worldwide, but in 2003 that number dropped to 600.
For now, scientists don't know what mechanism caused the decrease to happen, but they say future research and data collection will, hopefully, help them figure it out.
"The decrease in the number of hurricanes and the decrease in the number of hurricane days correspond almost exactly to when the number of intense hurricanes increase," Webster said. "There must be something monumental that will come along and kick us in the shin to help us understand that."
###
Hurricane Damage – 9 Months Later
The government agency responsible for assessing such things as damage to oil and gas infrastructure in the Gulf of Mexico (or
GOM, as the agency calls it) caused by Hurricanes Katrina and Rita, has issued a new report.
"Based on additional industry assessments, investigations, and reports, the number of pipelines damaged has risen to 457 from 183. The number of larger-diameter pipelines (10 inches or greater) that were damaged has risen to 101 from 64. Third-two have returned to service versus the previous number of 22."
That’s from a Minerals Management Services report. MMS says it overestimated the number of platforms destroyed – it was 113, not 115.
Should there be additional hurricanes in the GOM, check out www.mms.gov.
Be sure to read "DISASTER AFTER THE DISASTER" Article by Jeff Griffin in the May 2006 issue of Electrical Contractor Magazine. www.ecmag.com. All is not well in post-Katrina Nawlins'.
###
The critical role of the communications service provider is never more apparent than in the post disaster period after a major widespread event, like a hurricane. Last year, Hurricane Katrina was a huge wake-up call to the public. These disasters tend to unravel the fragile infrastructure of the affected area as well as the entire country.
Employers should ensure that their employees are well informed on the proper preparations for a hurricane. The employee’s family is priority #1, and the company’s ability to function after the hurricane is secondary. Many other businesses will depend upon the communications contractor to restore their communications and IT systems as quickly as possible. Some obvious attention should be placed on specific inventory needs to the individual customers. Stocking (circuit cards, connectors, cable, phones, etc.) to match the customer’s needs is an optional preparation that the customer may wish to finance.
Recently, several television programs have revisited the 2005 hurricane season, with particular emphasis on the Gulf Coast and Hurricane Katrina. Also, several other shows have portrayed possible mega-disasters like a major hurricane hitting New York City. These scenarios are not out of the realm of probability. One broadcast stated that the number of Category 4 and 5 hurricanes have increased 56% during the last 35 years. During this same period of time, the sea level has also risen. Storm surge is a major threat to coastal communities. Be prepared. Safety is too important to ignore.
But that’s just my opinion,
Frank Bisbee
"Heard On The Street" Monthly Column
www.wireville.com
4949 Sunbeam Rd, Suite 16
Jacksonville, FL 32257
(904) 645-9077 offfice
(904) 645-9058 fax
frank@wireville.com
Fiber Optic Cabling Is The Way To Go
INTRO: "I have touted using fiber optics for years because of its high-speed capacity, now it also appears to be the more cost-effective way to go for network infrastructure," observes James Carlini.
Copper is dead. Repeat after me. Copper is dead. Evidently that mantra is not shared by some analysts on Wall Street who if they "really" knew the telecommunications business, they would be questioning the strategy of building more copper-dependent network infrastructure. Basic costs for materials have skyrocketed.
The cost of many raw materials has shot up dramatically in the last year and some as recent as the last couple of months (See Charts below). According to a May 2006 CSC
(Communications Supply Corporation) newsletter that focused on the cost of
communications cabling:
In particular, copper (Comex) prices have increased by over
ninety-two cents ($0.92) per pound since the beginning of April with price
increases sometimes approaching twenty cents ($0.20) per day. To put this in
perspective; copper prices increased seventy-five cents ($0.75) in all of 2005.
This equates to a 58% increase in copper since January of 2006 and a 138%
increase since January of 2005!
For the moment, there is no stopping copper and looking
ahead there seems to be nothing to derail it. Worldwide copper consumption will
exceed production in 2006 by 100,000 tons according to a BaseMetals.com report.
The biggest reason for world copper supply tightness and sky-high prices
continues to be China, where industrial and urbanization have been underway all decade.
Patricia Mohr, vice president with Scotia Bank, said that
recent data suggest that the combined copper stored in Comex, London Metal
Exchange (LME) and Shanghai Futures Exchange warehouses are considered to be
around a 3.6-day global supply. This figure is near the low end of its recent
range of 2.8 days in 2004 and could reach that range once again by year's end.
Continued strikes and natural disasters across the globe are also contributing
to further disruptions to copper output. Output has been lost during a month
long stoppage at the La Caridad mine, owned by Grupo Mexico SA.
Freeport-McMoRan Copper & Gold Inc. said that variations in the richness of
deposits at its Grasberg mine in Indonesia led to a decline of a 1/3 in first
quarter production from the site, which is the world's second largest copper
mine.
THE BET THAT MADE NO SENSE
There was a bet made several years ago by some network engineers,
cabling companies, equipment manufacturers and corporate strategists at
carriers that speeds on copper would be increased and faster network speeds
could be easily achieved on existing copper infrastructure. There was no need
to upgrade to fiber. To me, that was a dumb bet.
My argument has always been, no matter how much you can
squeeze on copper, you can do so much more with fiber. If you are building a new campus or single
building, put in fiber optics as the communications network infrastructure
transmission media. That will be the
transmission media that matches the lifespan of the building.
This argument goes back over a good decade and some heeded
it as others continued using obsolete rules-of-thumb for cabling infrastructure
design.
Frank Bisbee, the publisher of Wireville.com, a monthly
newsletter said, “If you thought the prices at the gas pump were shocking, you
will be stunned by the price increases on copper-based cabling.”
He said that several manufacturers explained that the petroleum
cost increases were finding their way through to the cost of the resins for
jackets and insulation on cabling.
Adding to those additional cost burdens, the cable
manufacturers are facing a
skyrocketing set of price increases on copper itself. One manufacturer said that
the price for copper has shot up more than 22% in the last 3
weeks. And it's not over, according to
Bisbee. He got this from one of his
suppliers:
We have reluctantly been forced to increase prices on all
Cat 3, Cat 5e and Cat 6 cables. The new prices go into
affect immediately.
Unfortunately, the manufacturers are raising prices almost
continually, and therefore, our prices will be subject to these changes. Some
manufacturers are reviewing prices weekly! Prices may continue to increase.
General Cable, one of our suppliers and one of the largest in the world, made
the following announcement. "With copper rising at a much more accelerated
pace, we must shift our pricing policies to recover these costs more quickly.
In order to manage this incredible volatility of copper prices, we will adjust
pricing on a weekly basis until copper resumes the steadier path. We are trying
to keep product prices as stable as possible, so we will only adjust weekly
product prices for every $0.10 increase in Comex. These determinations will be
made every Friday at 1PM EST.”
Bisbee thinks that for many contractors and new facilities
developments, fiber optic solutions have reached parity with the high-end
copper-based UTP (Unshielded Twisted Pair) alternative. This new round of major cost increases that
has been added on to UTP will have many network designers reappraising their
cabling infrastructure designs and calculating that fiber optic cabling may be
the new "best answer.”
Each cabling infrastructure job should be evaluated
individually but one message is universal; the price of copper cabling may
continue to spiral upward.
CARLINI-ISM: If you
are building a new facility, you should be looking at wireless and fiber optics
as your transmission media, not copper.
Copyright 2006 – James Carlini
Check out www.carliniscomments.com
JAMES CARLINI’s BLOG.
Preformed Line Products Plays Major Role In Historic American Electric Power Transmission Line
Preformed Line Products Company
(PLP), a major supplier to the energy industry, played an instrumental role in
the construction of the nation's largest power line project scheduled for
completion in a few weeks.
PLP supplied
four products used in American Electric Power's Wyoming- Jacksons Ferry
transmission line located in West Virginia and
Virginia.
When completed in June, the $306 million, 90-mile transmission line will
connect power stations in Wyoming County, W. Va. and Wythe County, Va.
The 765,000-volt
line was constructed by Columbus-based AEP to address a growing customer demand
in its West Virginia and Virginia service territory. To help reduce
audible noise from the line, the project line uses a six-bundle conductor
configuration, the first of its kind used at this voltage in North
America. PLP is one of two suppliers who produce a product that
makes that configuration possible by holding the line in a hexagon
configuration.
AEP dedicated
its transmission line today in a special ceremony near Wytheville, Va. PLP
officials were present for the ceremony.
"We are
extremely proud to have played such an important role in the construction of
this transmission line," said Rob Ruhlman, chairman and chief executive
officer of Preformed Line Products. "Transmission lines of this type are
crucial in meeting the future energy needs of Americans and we salute American
Electric Power for its foresight and perseverance in completing this tremendous
project."
The transmission
line, which crosses rugged mountain terrain, strikes the right balance between
providing much-needed electric capacity and protecting the environment. The
line utilizes breakthrough technology to make it more efficient while reducing
audible noise levels.
PLP has a
worldwide reputation for making innovative products for the support and
protection of power line conductors.
Among the four
products provided by PLP is its CUSHION-GRIP(TM) Spacer Damper, which holds six
conductors in place between the towers along the transmission line.
These 30-inch
diameter spacer dampers, which are located 200 feet apart along the line, play
an important role in protecting the transmission line from wind and other
elements. The spacer damper separates the six sub- conductors in the span
between the towers. The damping element in the joint between the frame and the
arms greatly reduces damaging conductor motions that are created by the wind.
Elastomer inserts in the clamps protect the conductor from bending stresses and
wear.
PLP also
furnished its VARI-GRIP(TM) Dead-end and Big-Grip Dead-end products. Both are
used in anchoring transmission towers to the ground. The VARI-GRIP Dead-end
provides "full-strength" termination of strands used to guy the
V-type structures to the ground. These are the largest and strongest dead- end
products in the industry. The Big-Grip Dead-end provides a temporary anchoring
to help put the guy wires in place. Three-quarters of the towers are guyed
towers and quite suitable for the rugged terrain of Virginia
and West Virginia.
The fourth
product -- the BIRD FLIGHT(TM) Diverter - addresses an important environmental
concern, protecting birds that might fly into the transmission line. With the
diverter attached to the line, birds are more likely to avoid hitting them in
flight. The overhead shield wires, which rest atop the towers to divert
lightning strikes, are smaller than the power lines and are often not visible
to birds in flight. The diverters are placed 15 feet apart on the shield wires
and have proven to be very effective.
The four
products were made at PLP's plants in North Carolina,
Arkansas and Brazil. www.preformed.com
Snake Tray® Introduces Mega SnakeTM, A High Capacity Cable Tray
Snake Tray®
is proud to announce Mega SnakeÔ, our new high capacity cable tray
for overhead applications. Mega Snake’s
unique design can convey thousands of cables for large cable runs. The Snake
RailÔ, a built-in suspension system, requires no brackets and allows for
random placement of the hanging rod system.
The Snake RailÔ can seamlessly interface with other size Snake Trays as well as patch
panels, strain relief and fiber optic pass over devices. Onsite fabrication of turns, tees and cross
sections are no longer required with our pre-manufactured components. Mega
SnakeÔ is the first large sized cable tray to be built that nests together for
cost effective shipping and easy onsite handling. www.snaketray.com
Working Up A Sweat Over Power Consumption
“Is it warm in here, or is it just
me?” If servers could talk, and if that were the question posed by one of them
in a typical data center, the simple answer would be “Yes.” Not only is it
getting warmer wherever lots of equipment is clustered, but just about every
device is part of the problem. The bottom line—literally and figuratively—is
that it is getting incredibly expensive to keep that equipment cool.
Earth Day notwithstanding, forget about Global Warming: Equipment Warming may
be the more severe environmental problem, when it’s your network on the line.
In the past year, some eye-popping cost figures have been overlaid on the issue
of equipment cooling needs.
It can cost close to $9,000 to keep one high-end server properly cooled for a
year. That was the amount calculated by the analyst firm IDC, which issued a
report on the subject several months ago. If that sounds bad enough, consider
that IDC researched its report before the hurricane-triggered increases
in the costs of fuels. The analysts pegged the annual electric bill for U.S. data
centers at $3.3 billion.
For some companies, the cost of maintaining their equipment’s environment is
exceeding the cost of the equipment itself. It can be a tremendous drain on
departmental budgets, robbing communications/IT departments of dollars that
could be used in much more productive ways.
The problem has been compounded in the last several years because of the
increased density of equipment. When you can put the networking equivalent of
an entire server on a single blade, it may be a great technical accomplishment,
but unfortunately power consumption doesn’t get shrunk by the same proportions.
Pack a lot of this more powerful equipment into a given space, and the heat
waves just roll out of it.
We hate to just whine about things, without looking for some silver lining in
the cloud. It’s just our optimistic nature. So we are happy to tell you that
there is progress being made. Just as technology giveth (heat in this case),
technology is also finding ways to taketh away.
Solutions are showing up in the form of more power-efficient processors, and
vendors are starting to offer equipment in different electricity-consuming
grades so you can opt for “greener” equipment. That is on the heat-producing
side. On the cooling side, such developments as water chillers for improved
cooling capacity, software tools enabling better designs for equipment
placement in data centers, and integrated blades with cooling technology are
coming onto the market.
Just as people get lethargic when the temperature climbs, so does our computing
and network equipment. This may be one more concern to add to all the other
things you and your department have to worry about—but just be sure not to blow
your cool.
This article, written by Kevin Tanzillo of Dux PR (kevin@duxpr.com) first
appeared in the April 2006 ACUTA eNews. Republished with permission from the
author and ACUTA (http://www.acuta.org).

Expert Tech Witnesses Needed To Make Complex Technology Simple
Carlini’s Comments, ePrairie’s oldest
column, runs every Wednesday. Its mission is to offer the common man’s
view on business and technology issues while questioning the leadership and
visions of “pseudo” experts.
As more issues become disputed in municipal rights of way,
SEC compliance and other technology-based arguments, the side with the best
litigation support will win. In cases involving technology, the trick is to
make the complex technology simple rather than making the simple technology
complex, writes adjunct Northwestern professor James Carlini.
The importance of having an expert witness is becoming more
of a key element for defense as well as offense in cases and disputes involving
technology, regulatory issues and certain criminal cases that are intertwined
with elements of technology.
Many people like watching the television show CSI because it
is interesting and it sometimes presents the views of expert witnesses as they
offer complex evidence to a jury. The reality in civil cases that involve
technology issues is that the contested issue often never goes to trial and is
settled out of court.
In civil and federal cases involving technology, the reviews
and presentation of expert opinions can become complex.
The trick is to get someone who can sort out all the
information, put it into a concise report and explain everything in an
apples-and-oranges comparison. This is hugely important because the average
judge, jurist, public utility commission member and even many lawyers do not
understand the depth of technology being disputed.
Due to the nature of technology and networks, the disputed
costs usually go into the millions of dollars. There also have been wrongful
death cases like one I was on involving a man calling 911 and getting a recorded
message saying he was dialing an invalid number. In that case, the municipality
paid out a seven-figure settlement because someone didn’t do his or her job in
making sure a database had all the addresses in it.
If there is a network or system failure, patent infringement
or project dispute, chances are it is a multimillion-dollar lawsuit sometimes
with a countersuit. When there are millions of dollars on the table, both sides
are eager to sweep it up and claim it is rightfully theirs. Having an edge to
win the decision is paramount.
Win, Place or Show
Those who pride themselves on being able to snow someone
with their technical jargon and all their certificates are not the ones you
want describing your dispute to a legal or regulatory entity. You will lose in
court because the judge and jury will fail to comprehend your side of the case.
Tip: Get someone who can understand and then explain your
complex system or network infrastructure in everyday terms.
One of the most high-pressure meetings I was ever in was at
a racetrack with an owner, CFO and legal counsel reviewing a satellite-based
initiative they were financing. They wanted to ensure they were moving in the
right direction on a project under dispute that included selling off their excess
satellite bandwidth with financial companies to transmit their market data.
Unfortunately, their consultant set them up with a level of
service that would not be acceptable to the financial and brokerage companies.
Trying to explain the technical service levels and their
associated costs would not have been successful. Instead, I said at the last
minute: “Just like you, people in the financial and brokerage area like to go
with winners. On the service level of satellites, there are three levels just like
win, place and show. You have show.”
At that point, all the racetrack executives understood and
decided the project was not feasible.
If they went with the higher service, there would be no
profitability in the venture. Giving a concise summary that everyone around the
table could understand made it possible for them to make a tough decision that
immediately cut their expenditures on a project that would not have gone
anywhere. The strategic partnership ended at that moment.
The same principles apply to developing testimonies for
legal disputes. You must have someone who can look at the situation, pick out
the relevant information and then craft it into a concise and convincing
presentation to strengthen the legal argument.
In computer forensics or technology forensics, that includes
communication networks. Services, information and data needed for evidence has
to be processed correctly.
There are five steps in the process of forensics as applied
to technology:
1. Collection
2. Preservation
3. Analysis
4. Presentation
5. Archiving
In the collection process, something as innocuous as
shutting down a computer could actually damage the evidence you want to
preserve. According to forensics author Christopher L.T. Brown: “Almost 50 files
are changed in some way on each boot of the Windows XP operating system and
five or more new files are created.”
It is critical to understand these nuances when going about
collecting and preserving information. If your company has gotten into a lawsuit
or has received an audit from the SEC, you should get someone who understands
the collection and preservation process from a litigation standpoint. You
shouldn’t get your systems administrator.
Another reason to get someone from outside your organization
is that people on the inside might part of the criminal activity. In the case
of a false bomb threat at a school, the “inside people” didn’t understand the
capabilities of the payphone technology. They were trying to hang a student
with a felony he did not commit.
This incident happened three weeks before Columbine. The
school administrators wanted to make an example out of this student who turned
out to do nothing wrong. The student just reported suspicious activity to the
principal as he should have. The school administrators came to a wrong
conclusion about a payphone’s ability to accept incoming calls.
While a sticker on the phone said it could not, in fact it
could accept incoming calls. Before investigating the facts, they decided this
was just a senior prank to get people out of the building early. They wanted to
prosecute this senior for fabricating the story. The bottom line is he stuck to
his story and even took a polygraph test. We also proved that the payphone
could accept incoming calls. The charges were dismissed.
Tip: Do not listen to all the “experts” at your company
or your vendor. Get a second opinion that’s objective. Get it fast.
Lawyers Are Not Technologists
Lawyers need help in gathering, reviewing and analyzing
information as well as presenting complex arguments dealing with technology.
The good ones understand that and will seek out expert witnesses who can help
in several ways. There are different areas through which lawyers become more
effective by using an expert witness:
1. Developing a
list of what is needed for defending or prosecuting a case
2. Researching relevant information and building a report
3. Pointing out critical information and how it relates to the case
4. Developing questions to ask the opposition
5. Prioritizing the data and electronic “artifacts” for inclusion as evidence
6. Developing the presentation of that evidence
7. Developing and delivering testimony
8. Reviewing and analyzing the opposition’s testimony
9. Providing testimony and exhibits that support the legal arguments
Carlinism: The use of expert witnesses in technology
cases can only enhance the strength of the argument. In cases involving
technology, the trick is to make the complex technology simple rather than
making the simple technology complex.
Check out the blog of James Carlini at http://www.carliniscomments.com.
James Carlini is an adjunct professor at Northwestern University.
He is also president of Carlini
& Associates. Carlini can be reached at james.carlini@sbcglobal.net or
773-370-1888.
Click here for Carlini’s full biography.
DYMO Industrial Launches New RhinoPRO Colored Vinyl Labels
Proper labeling and identification has never been so important. From
commercial applications to our homes, people today rely more heavily on
electronic portable label printers than ever before. With advances in factory
and home automation, high density data and multi-gigabit applications, color
coding has become an increasingly important way to differentiate advanced
services. For this reason, DYMO Industrial, a worldwide leader in portable
label printing has introduced new colored vinyl labels as an extension of its
already wide array of RhinoPRO Industrial labels.
Color coding gives users a better visual recognition of critical, even
life-line services. These labels are ideal for fire and life safety
applications, broadcast facilities, CATV headends, mission critical data
centers, Telco central offices as well as outside plant applications and of
course traditional applications like patch panels and wire and cable marking.
Vibrant colors – Red, Orange,
Yellow, Green and White – make them clearly recognizable and have the added
benefit of being usable in outdoor environments due to their resistance to
direct UV light. And, like all RhinoPRO labels, the printing on the RhinoPRO
Vinyl labels won’t ever smudge or fade.
“Today’s advanced business applications often require color coding to
differentiate services” said Doug Waldal, Global Director of the DYMO
Industrial Business Unit. “With the new RhinoPRO colored vinyl labels,
we’ve given users that and much more. They now have the ability to
accurately and confidently label their work with the assurance that the labels
will stick and last. We’ve teamed the most economical, most user-friendly and
feature rich printers – the RhinoPRO 5000 and the RhinoPRO 3000 – with the
highest performing colored vinyl labels on the market for a solution that is
unmatched.”
The new RhinoPRO Colored Vinyl Labels are the latest in a complete line of
professional labels designed for today’s installation professionals. The vinyl
label labels now join the RhinoPRO labeling family of Flexible Nylon, Permanent
Polyester, Metallized Permanent Polyester as well as Heat Shrink Tubing – a
unique offering in printers at this price range. RhinoPRO Colored Vinyl Labels
are available now in three sizes: 3/8”, 1/2", & 3/4” as well as five
colors Red, Orange,
Yellow, Green and White. They work in both the RhinoPRO 5000 and the
RhinoPRO 3000.
Vinyl labels retail from $15.99 - $17.99, and the RhinoPRO 3000 and RhinoPRO
5000 retail for $99.99 and $149.99 respectively. All are available now
through your local distributor. For more information please visit
www.rhinolabeling.com.

TFM Forum - An Event Developed To Streamline The Purchase Of Volume Facility Management Solutions:
Dear Facility
Executive,
I invite you to
participate as an attendee at the inaugural TFM Forum at the exquisite Château
Élan in Atlanta, Georgia on October 24-26, 2006.
This event will deliver an intimate gathering of facility executives for candid
discussion, informative workshops, think tanks and informal networking with
leading industry suppliers.
Endorsed by TFM
magazine this strategic buying event was designed for facility executives like
you faced with the challenge of high volume purchasing of products and services
for your organization. This complimentary event, which includes deluxe
accommodations, meals, and ground transportation in Atlanta, will provide just the right
atmosphere of sophistication and remote serenity to foster a conducive
atmosphere for the discussion of any upcoming new construction or renovation
projects that you may be working on.
Fill out a delegate
application form today at: http://www.tfmforum.com/facilityExecutiveApplication.htm
The TFM magazine
editors have designed a program that will provide you with strategic and
practical information that will help you select the right solutions for your
organization. Below are some of the high
level keynotes, seminars, and think tanks that will be presented at the
inaugural event:
Opening Keynote:
* Personal Best:
Achieving FM Excellence
Closing Keynote:
* Shaping The
Future Of Facility Management: An Interactive Working Session
Seminars/Workshops/Think
Tanks:
* Budgeting for
Effective Facilities
* High Performance,
High Technology Workplaces=High Performance Facilities
* Becoming Best In
Class: Gain Greater Customer Connectivity by Differentiating Service
Delivery Systems
* Ergonomics: How
It Influences Employee Retention and Productivity Levels
* Mission
Critical Facilities: Designing Them And Protecting Them
* Technology and
the Business of Facility Management
* Making A Business
Case for Facilities Management: Talking to the C-Suites
* Facility Security
* HVAC & IAQ:
Legal and Financial Issues
* Why Be
Sustainable? Evaluating the Case for High Performance Buildings
If you're the
decision maker who is responsible for purchasing products and services for your
organization, you cannot afford to miss The TFM Forum.
Fill out a delegate
application form today at: http://www.tfmforum.com/facilityExecutiveApplication.htm
While you're at The
TFM Forum, you'll enjoy complimentary deluxe accommodations at the Château Élan
Winery and Resort in Atlanta,
GA, gourmet meals, access to the
spa, and an incredible educational experience that will save you time and
potentially thousands of dollars. Plus, you'll have the opportunity to network
with other Facility Executives in charge of their company's new construction
and/or renovation projects.
I look forward to
seeing you in October
Sincerely,
Susan Coene
President
TFM Forum
www.TFMForum.com
P.S. Space is limited for this invitation only
event. Please fill out your application
form today and find out if you qualify for the inaugural TFM Forum at the
exquisite Château Élan in Atlanta,
Georgia.
Computer Estimating by Mike Holt May 2006
In today’s construction industry, the use of computers for
estimating is commonplace. So common in fact, anyone planning a career as an
electrical estimator better plan on developing an expertise in using computers
- especially estimating software. As the cheapest computers today are very fast
and powerful, the computer itself is no longer a focus point: the primary focus
is and will forever be the software.
Incredible advances in estimating software have improved the
estimating process greatly. These programs allow estimators to increase the
number of bids, hone their accuracy, create consistency, improve project
management, improve the purchase and control of materials, and better the
company’s bottom line. Some programs are now capable of actually doing the
counting and estimating for you. There are even programs that will assist an
estimator with design criteria and learning the NEC.
Today’s estimators must possess total control of the
software. For this, they will need to develop strong visualization skills.
Visualization skills allow the estimator to see their desired output
from the software. This will allow them to input the information
correctly to achieve the desired, successful output.
Even with all this super-technology, one element of
estimating remains and is still required: the estimator and his or her
knowledge of electrical installations. This can and never will be replaced by a
machine and software. It is the merging, or interface, of the two that
today’s estimator must master.
8.01 Myths and Truths
Myth: Computerized
estimates are more accurate than those done the old, by hand method.
Truth: Any
estimate, done by hand or with the use of a computer, is only as good as the
estimator who makes and reviews it.
Computer assisted estimates are not necessarily more
complete or more accurate than a “by hand” estimate. Both types of estimates
are deeply affected by a simple formula: Quality in = Quality out.
It doesn’t matter how good the software is, or how large the
database. If the material items in the database are not priced; or if the labor
items are incorrectly labored (or worse – they have no labor values at all); or
if you simply fail to make correct entries; or use the wrong database – your
estimates can carry the potential to be highly flawed. A highly flawed estimate
is either too low or too high. Either way the company loses. It is the
estimator’s primary job to know if the estimate is right.
Myth: Computerized
estimates take less time than those done the old, by hand way.
Truth: This is a
slight myth. Most computer assisted estimates can be completed in less time,
but they can often take longer. Again, it depends on the estimator. What his ‘take-off
and entry style’ is or what the company’s take-off policies
are. There are many variables when using computers. These variables give you the
choice of how fast or slow you want to be and when.
A standard estimate has 2 primary stages – take-off
and extension.
During the take-off stage, using software can often
be a slower process than the older, simpler method of counting symbols and
writing the totals down on a paper spreadsheet. The interface with software
requires additional time and effort to find or build the right items or
assemblies in the database. The proper breakout location must be assigned and
set prior to entry. A “count entry” function is required. This requires typing
in and/or clicking a button for the correct value entry. This is a lot of work
compared to hand writing a symbol or note and then placing a figure underneath
it.
Where the speed differential occurs is primarily after the take-off
stage is done and all the entry is complete. This is the time of extension.
It is in this single function that the computer absolutely,
without mercy defeats the old “by hand” method. The old method requires a very
detailed write-up and expansion of the counted items. A light fixture, for
example, may have 7-10 individual components which need to be written down,
along with their associated material prices and labor units. Then these values
need to be calculated against the quantities and sub-totals need to be entered
for each. After all this, final totals need to be summed up. This takes a great
deal of time, effort, accuracy and hand strength. After all this, it is likely
that someone else will need to double-check the extensions for accuracy.
Imagine the time required to complete this process on a bid that has 3 or more Bid
Form items. Worse, imagine what has to be done if something changes or you
find a mistake - after you create these final extensions.
With computer estimating software, the extension phase
becomes a simple selection of take-off entries and the desired report format.
Then a simple push of a button starts the calculations. The computer does the
rest with more accuracy and speed than any human or even a large group of humans
ever could.
8.02 Advantages and
Benefits
The Estimator is still in control
A computer and estimating software are simply estimating
tools. They are only as efficient as the estimator – the one responsible for
telling the computer what to do. Even with the latest technology of CAD
Estimating programs which interface digital drawings and the computer
estimating database, allowing the computer to count the electrical designs -
the estimator still plays the most vital role by controlling what is
counted, entered, calculated and extended.
Today’s engineers have the technology to design electrical
installations in 3D using high-powered software and computers. Imagine these 3D
designs being integrated with an estimating software database. Upon completion
of the design, a simple click of a button can create a complete materials and
labor report. But again, these reports can only be as detailed as the estimator
can imagine them to be and are highly subject to how in-control of the
software the estimator is.
Saves you time so you can do more!
A computer does thousands of mathematical computations in a
fraction of a second, never makes an error, never gets tired or careless, and
never forgets the information that is stored. Computer estimating will reduce
your estimating time and cost because you no longer need to price, labor,
extend, or total material or labor by hand.
This translates into additional time for other important
functions. Such as: more time to review the estimate; time to bid more jobs;
time to better organize and manage the company; or to spend more time with the
family.
Better Control of
Material Cost
Once the take-off is complete and the take-off quantities
have been entered into the computer, a report of all the materials required for
the job can be printed and broken down by job phase. This list can be submitted
to multiple suppliers in order to get competitive prices and fixed delivery
dates. The estimate can also be shared by a contractor’s purchasing and
accounting departments. Cost tracking and inventory control become much simpler
when all the information is generated and controlled by a computer. In
addition, you can reduce the storage requirements for material, thereby
reducing waste and theft.
Labor Savings
A computer generated estimate provides great flexibility to
extend the project many different ways. By system, by floor, by building, site
work only, by phase, etc. Detailed information like this can be shared with the
field, giving electricians on the job labor budgets and goals. This helps them
ensure the job gets completed on time. It can also help them order materials,
allowing for better control of their arrival to the jobsite, reducing inventory
and handling time.
Reduces Overhead
Although the software can be expensive and training costs
add yet another expense, a contractor’s overhead will still be decreased.
Reduced estimating costs are derived from the ability of one estimator being
able to bid more jobs faster. Materials inventory control is improved with less
storage space cost and reduced financing costs. You’ll also improve billing and
expedite collections. This will increase cash flow.
When the estimating department is fully integrated with all
of other departments, the increased efficiency will spread itself throughout
the company and reduce overhead substantially.
Increase Business
Volume
The savings in estimating time will permit you to estimate
more jobs to expand your business volume. Using computer generated estimates
can also improve your marketing as you can present a more detailed and
professional looking package to your clients. You should also be able to
service your clients better by having the ability to accommodate any pricing
structures they require. The more details you can provide your client, the more
confidence they will have in your company’s knowledge of their projects. This
too will result in more requests for bids, which will ultimately result in more
contracts won.
Added Confidence and
Security
A computer estimate provides you with increased confidence
and security that your bid price is correct. It will also provide you with more
consistent and accurate historical data for jobs of the same types. This will
improve your competitiveness and increase your profit margins.
8.03 Software Selection
Purchase
Considerations
Simple to Use. The software should be logical,
intuitive, simple to use, and easy to understand. The commands must be precise
and there should not be any danger of losing data. There should be an on-screen
audit trail to review and modify the take-off at any time.
Portability. A software package should be portable so
it can be used at the office, at home, or even in your car with a laptop or
possibly a palmtop computer.
Flexibility. The software should provide the
capability of factoring labor or material cost for every line of the take-off
to reflect diverse installation conditions. You should be able to view or
change anything in the estimate at any point.
Reports. A wide variety of reports should be
available to furnish information to the client, as well as to provide
information for project management decisions.
Don’t expect computer estimating software to fit all of your
needs. There will always be something your software can’t do that you wish it
could. However, a quality estimating system should not require you to make too
many major adjustments in your estimating style. In fact, estimating software
should considerably improve your estimating techniques by giving you greater
flexibility to be creative.
How Much Should It
Cost?
The cost of computerizing a business depends on whether or
not you already have a computer. However, do not make the mistake of trying to
use an old, outdated computer to run new, super-charged software. There will be
great frustrations and much disappointment. Also, you will not be getting the
most from your software investment.
There are always lower priced systems available, but strong
consideration of the major players should be given. A single user license for a
quality estimating software system costs between $2,500 and $4,000. Multi-user
or Network versions will cost more according to how many users will need to be
licensed.
Make your decision based on the value you will receive for
your investment. Be sure you can count on long-range service from the company
and that they always give you close personal attention.
One last budget issue: Don’t forget to account for annual
tech support fees. These fees and the services can cost as much as a single
user license but they will pay for themselves easily over the course of a year.
Especially when a tech helps you restore a job file an hour before the bid is
due.
Software is not a 1-time expense. Just like your computers,
it carries a continuous cost of annual support fees, maintenance, repair and upgrades.
Can You Afford It?
In today’s world, it’s highly unlikely that you can be
competitive if you estimate without a computer. The question is not whether you
can afford to purchase a computer and estimating software but whether, can you
afford not to use these tools when estimating jobs?
To determine the dollars required in sales to cover the
purchase of computer estimating software, use the following formula:
Sales needed to cover cost of estimating software = Cost of
Estimating System per Year/Gross Profit Percent (Overhead + Profit)
Example: How much must sales increase per year to cover the
cost of an estimating system, based on the following factors: Estimating system
to cost $6,000 includes software, computer, and training and your accountant indicates
that your gross profit margin is 30 percent.
Sales Increase Required per Year = $1,500/0.30 = $5,000
Sales Increase Required per Month = $5,000/12 = $417
To pay for the software you only need $20,000 in additional
sales over the life of the software!
Who Sells Estimating
Software?
Because of the technical nature of electrical estimating,
estimating software is not available in computer stores. Only a person who has
been trained in electrical contracting can adequately explain how computerized
estimating works, and the many ways it will benefit you.
Find out as much as you can about the software vendor. How
long have they been in the business of selling software? How many customers do
they have? What other software products do they sell? What is their background
in estimating and electrical contracting? Don’t get too excited, take your time
to investigate the different vendors and make a selection based on facts, not
opinions. If possible, see if you can use the software on a trial basis.
Naturally this will cost you a few hundred dollars, insist on money back
guarantee.
Here is a list of the major estimating software companies:
Accubid: www.Accubid.com
Denver, CO 1-800-222-8243
McCormick: www.McCormicksys.com
Chandler, AZ
1- 800 444 4890
Con-Est: www.conest.com
Manchester, NH
1-800-662-7687
Estimation: www.estimation.com
Linthicum Heights, MD 1-800-275-6475
Timberline: www.sagetimberlineoffice.com Beaverton, OR
1-800-628-6583
Vision-InfoSoft: www.visioninfosoft.com
Carlsbad, CA 1-800-258-7752
In the event that any of the above noted information becomes
outdated, you can always go to www.MikeHolt.com
and click on our “Estimating Software” link. Here you will find links to all
the major software companies updated regularly.
8.04 Training and
Support
Don’t expect miracles and be prepared to devote your
time. Regardless of how well estimating
software is designed, don’t expect optimum results without complete training.
Professional training is expensive and requires time away from the office. Be
prepared to devote serious time to learning how to use it. This will be
extremely difficult to do at the same time you are trying to estimate multiple
projects. You should try to devote extra hours of training after work or on the
weekend. The more time you put into using the program, the faster you will
master it.
Even the most carefully designed software requires training,
service, support, and technical assistance. These requirements are even more
important when the software is highly specialized, and requires special skills,
experience, and background in the field for which the software was designed.
Specialized software systems should be purchased directly
from the software developer, who is equipped to explain the product, and
provide the training and support needed if you run into difficulty.
Warning: If you attempt to use your software without proper
training, you may never learn all of the valuable features that are designed
within the program.
8.05 Pricing Services
In order to effectively use an estimating software program,
you will also need to subscribe to a Materials Pricing Program such as
Electrical Resources, Inc. EPS Plus, Trade Service Corp.’s Traser
or Vision InfoSoft’s Epic pricing programs. By using UPC and DCI
commodity codes, these programs interface with most major estimating software
programs and price all the individual material items in the database. Many
companies have contracted with pricing services to save office time, and to
gain assurance they have current material prices.
If you do decide to use a pricing service, be sure you
select one whose prices are broken down by geographical area, so that they will
more accurately reflect those where your job is located. Also, just as you
checked the background of companies offering estimating software, you should
inquire as to the background of companies offering pricing services. Where do
they get their material prices? What is their relationship to the electrical
industry?
If you decide you don’t want to use a pricing service, you
will most likely need to create material reports for your vendors to price on
every estimate you do. This may add to your work load and will make you
dependent on your vendors for service.
8.06 Frequently Asked
Questions
Do I need to be a highly trained computer operator?
No, but it certainly helps. Most software vendors assume
that you have no computer experience and designed their software to be easy to
learn and use. All you need to do is follow the commands on the screen to get
the results you want. In fact, after a brief training period, a clerical
employee can use the take-off and complete the estimate for you. Leaving you
more free time to start another bid, or devote yourself to other
responsibilities. However, some programs are very advanced and can get very
involved. Those who benefit the most from these features are those who have a
great understanding of operating a computer.
Can I still do Manual take-off?
Yes. With most any estimating software, you have two methods
of performing the take-off; the manual method or the direct entry method.
Manual Take-Off - This method requires two steps.
First, you complete the take-off, writing all count and take-off information on
a paper spreadsheet. Then you enter that information into the estimating
software’s database. This method is a bit slower and in some ways defeats one
of the main features of using software.
Direct Take-Off – This method involves entering the
count and take-off information directly into the computer as you go. This
method will slow you down at first. But when mastered, this step saving method
permits the estimate to be completed much quicker and with more accuracy as it
is easier to remember what something is when you count it than it is 2 days
later.
How much time can I save?
It depends on the software, the estimator, and the
complexity of the job. As the estimator becomes more familiar with the system
and database, less time is required. The more complicated the job, the more
time saved. As a general rule, once proficient - you should be able to estimate
and extend in much less time than it would take you to do the job
manually.
Will my bid accuracy be improved?
Yes, no, maybe – it all depends on you. A computer doesn’t
make mistakes when it’s tired or overworked. It doesn’t forget the data it has
stored when distractions occur. It doesn’t omit steps in calculation and it
doesn’t make errors in overlooking taxes, overhead, or profit.
The accuracy of your bid is only as accurate as your input.
This rule also applies to the input and creation of your database, not just
what you estimate. It also plays a major role during the extension phase of
your estimates. If you do not extend your estimate accurately, you will not
have an accurate estimate.
Always remember: the computer will only do what you tell it
to do.
Will My Estimates be as Complete?
Yes, no, maybe. Again, it all depends on you, the database
and your input. If you succeed in accurate control and entry, your estimates
should be more complete than any done by hand. They will also carry more
information to increase your efficiency, impress your customers, as well as
improve profit margins.
Must I Change My Methods of Estimating?
Yes, no, maybe. The estimating software should be flexible
and adapt to your estimating style, but don’t expect the software to fit all of
your needs perfectly. You may also find yourself exploring deeper waters
because the computer is now allowing you to be more creative. Computerized
estimating can produce amazing results and highly useful estimates. But you can
also get in trouble with controlling what you enter, maintaining tight
deadlines and confusing yourself. As you explore the deeper waters, make sure
you always maintain the primary goal that is Bid Day and exactly what
you need to achieve for a successful bid.
Can I Realistically Expect to Increase Profits?
Yes, as long as you stay focused on learning as much as you
can about the software, interpreting its output, maintaining the quality of
your input, controlling your database, tracking your progress and taking note
of your failures. Reducing estimating time means you will be bidding more jobs.
This means winning more contracts. Knowing how to use the software will allow
you to better control costs and improve project management. All of this should
translate into bigger profits.
How big must I be to achieve any benefit?
Size doesn’t matter. Even the smallest electrical contractor
can benefit from using a computer and estimating software to increase business
efficiency. Small companies, where the owner or manager typically does 100% of
the estimating, can use computerized estimating to free more time for
administration, selling, and project management.
How long will it take to learn how to use a computer
estimating software?
Don’t rush it. Give yourself 6 months to a year to become
somewhat proficient. 2 years to get really good. Much of it depends on your
experience with computers, how good an estimator you are, and the amount of
time you invest learning how to run the software. Don’t expect miracles, don’t
get frustrated and quit. Keep pushing your limits. Those with lots of
experience will be estimating in a matter of days or even hours, without
attending a single training class! Those with less experience may struggle and
require a few months to get comfortable with the process. For others, a
training class may be necessary. Most software firms offer training courses and
user seminars specifically for their products. Although sometimes expensive,
they can provide priceless training and tips on how to use the program to its
fullest potential.
Fluke Networks Provides Distributed Network Analysis And Monitoring Capability For InteropNet
InteropNet uses Fluke Networks' OptiView solutions to ensure
uptime and manage change during limited-time event
Fluke Networks is the official Distributed Analysis and
Troubleshooting sponsor that will manage key portions of InteropNet, the event
network that provides reliable, high-speed network services to all Interop Las
Vegas 2006 exhibitors, conferences and meeting rooms using the latest
technologies. The Fluke Networks Distributed Network Analysis and Monitoring
Solution used in the InteropNet enables staff to see what is happening on
remote parts of the network, and troubleshoot as if they were there. By
identifying the root cause of a problem and fixing it from the Network
Operations Center (NOC), Mean Time to Repair (MTTR) can be reduced by as much
as 90%. For a limited-duration event
such as Interop, the immediate problem resolution delivered by this solution is
essential.
"The InteropNet addresses networking challenges faced
by all businesses -- changing technology , troubleshooting, balancing traffic
-- multiplied by the pressure of a
limited-duration event," said Lenny Heymann, Interop General Manager. "With over 400 exhibitors installing and
removing practically anything at any time, our ability to rapidly see and mange
what's changing on the network is critical."
The InteropNet is the world's largest mobile civilian
network. Using components from more than
25 suppliers, the InteropNet is constructed over a two-week period in a San Francisco -area warehouse, partially broken down and
then trucked to the show hall at the Mandalay
Bay Convention
Center in Las Vegas. There it is installed in four days, after
which it serves as the essential communications link for over 50 meeting rooms,
400 exhibitor booths and numerous off-site locations. Registration for over 18,000 conference attendees
is also done over the InteropNet.
The Distributed Network Analysis and Monitoring Solution is
built around Fluke Networks' OptiViewtm Server, which collects and correlates
detailed performance information gathered from multiple OptiView Workgroup Analyzers
and OptiView WAN Analyzers placed at remote locations through Interop. Using a system such as that displayed in the
InteropNet allows network managers to take a proactive approach to managing the
distributed enterprise, providing higher levels of service to users and
dramatically reducing MTTR, all while lowering costs. www.flukenetworks.com
NAED Announces New Officers For 2006-2007
The National Association of Electrical Distributors (NAED)
announces its new Board of Directors for 2006 - 2007. Led by the NAED chair,
the Board of Directors is a dedicated group of industry leaders who volunteer
their time and efforts to improve the association and the electrical
distribution channel.
The 2006 - 2007 NAED Chair of the Board is John Duda,
chairman and CEO of Butler Supply, Inc., in St. Louis, Mo.
Duda has dedicated more than 38 years to electrical distribution, serving in a
variety of leadership and volunteer positions for NAED. In addition to being on
the NAED Board of Directors, he has served as NAED Foundation Chairman, Central
Region Vice President and Missouri River Club President, as well as
participating in the NAED Foundation’s Channel Advantage Partnership endowment
and Finance Committee. Through his message, “NAED: Focus on the Future,” Duda
will encourage the industry to examine trends and implement the industry best
practices that NAED Task Forces have developed in the last two years. He will
become NAED chairman at the conclusion of the 2006 Annual Meeting held April
22-26 in Orlando, Fla.
“I'm very honored to serve as NAED chairman this year. I
believe that a strong, national trade association that is attuned to the needs
and wants of its members is an incredibly valuable resource. We have a great
group of people representing the electrical industry on the NAED Board,"
Duda said. "With the staff's help, NAED has come up with some great
programs and products in the past couple of years, and now it's up to the board
to build participation.”
Tammy Miller, CEO of Border States Electric Supply in Fargo, N.D.,
will be Chair-Elect. She will be working closely with Duda to assess and meet
the needs of the industry. Miller became CEO of Border States, the nation’s
14th-largest electrical distributor, in January 2006 after serving as company
president during 2005. Previously she was executive vice president, CFO and
general manager for the company’s southwest region. Active in NAED, she has
been a member of the association’s Board of Directors for the past seven years
and most recently has been Western Region Vice President. She has chaired the
NAED Finance Committee and Special Pricing Authorization (SPA) Distributor Task
Force. She also serves on the Channel Advantage Partnership Council. Miller
will become NAED chair at the conclusion of the 2007 Annual Meeting, held May 5
– 9 in Washington, D.C.
The 2006 - 2007 NAED
Board of Directors are:
• John Duda,
NAED Chairman, Butler Supply, Inc., St.
Louis, Mo.
• Tammy
Miller, NAED Chair-Elect, Border States
Electric Supply, Fargo, N.D.
• Bill
Elliott, NAED Past Chair, Elliott Electric Supply, Nacogdoches, Texas
• Sandra
Rosecrans, NAED Eastern Region Vice President, City Electric Co., Inc., Syracuse, N.Y.
• Les
Williamson, NAED Western Region Vice President, Eoff Electric Co., Portland, Ore.
• George
Adams, NAED South Central Region Vice President, Electric Supply of Tampa,
Inc., Tampa, Fla.
• Daniel
Gray, NAED Eastern Region Vice President-Elect, Independent Electric Supply, Somerville, Mass.
• Thomas
Isenberg, NAED Western Region Vice President-Elect, Western Extralite Co., Kansas City, Mo.
• Glenn
Goedecke, NAED South Central Region Vice President-Elect, Mayer Electric Supply
Co., Birmingham, Ala.
• D. Brent
Spear, NAED Member at Large, Electrical Distributors, Inc., Charlotte, N.C.
• Cara Gordon
Potter, NAED Member at Large, Gordon Electric Supply Inc., Kankakee, Ill.
• Robert
Reynolds, Jr., NAED Member at Large, Graybar Electric Company, Inc., St. Louis, Mo.
• Joe
Huffman, NAED Member at Large, Consolidated Electrical Distributors, Inc., Westlake Village, Calif.
• Lawrence
Stern, NAED Finance Committee Chair, Standard Electric Supply Co., Milwaukee, Wis.
• Jack
Mumford, NAED Foundation Chair, Western Region Sonepar USA, Portland,
Ore.
• Richard
Waterman, NAED Foundation Chair-Elect, Rexel, Inc., Dallas, Texas
• Robert
Smith, NAED Manufacturer Representative, Pass & Seymour/Legrand, Syracuse, N.Y.
• Todd Kumm,
IDEA Vice Chair, Dakota Supply Group, Fargo,
N.D.
• Amy Treadway,
Your Emerging Talent (YET) Chair, Treadway Electric Company, Inc., Little Rock, Ark.
As the governing body of NAED, the Board of Directors is
accountable for the effective performance and direction of the association; as
well as communicating to the membership about NAED’s activities and policies.
Within the framework of the association’s by-laws and policies, the Board of
Directors determines measurements for success, establishes policy imperatives,
defines the organization’s vision for the future, fulfills fiduciary
obligations and serves as champions of the association. NAED officers attend
two NAED Board meetings a year and are encouraged to attend all NAED Regional
and Annual Meetings.
NAED is the trade association for the $70+ billion electrical
distribution industry. Through networking, education, research, and
benchmarking, NAED helps electrical distributors increase profitability and
improve the channel. NAED’s membership represents approximately 4,100 locations
internationally. www.na |